Re: National security backdoor.
From: Bill Unruh (unruh_at_string.physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 04/20/04
- Next message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Previous message: Me_at_myhouse.com: "Unix virus protection?"
- In reply to: Heino Meier: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Next in thread: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Mikael Holm: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Colin B.: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Wendel: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:50:53 +0000 (UTC)
Heino Meier <andikr@gmx.de> writes:
]What ?
]> telnetd backdoor is old news. much better backdoor in sshd and remotes in
]> apache and the new openbsd dos.
]Can you explain the sshd backdoor a bit near? I never heard about it
Not surprising you have not heard about it. It is
a) So top secret that if you had, you would be dead
b) A load of codswollop.
Take your pick.
- Next message: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Previous message: Me_at_myhouse.com: "Unix virus protection?"
- In reply to: Heino Meier: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Next in thread: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Mikael Holm: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Colin B.: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Wendel: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]