Re: National security backdoor.
david20_at_alpha1.mdx.ac.uk
Date: 04/06/04
- Previous message: Jon A. Solworth: "Re: National security backdoor."
- In reply to: Jon A. Solworth: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Next in thread: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 15:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
In article <okh9k1-592.ln1@parsys.cs.uic.edu>, "Jon A. Solworth" <solworth@RemoveThisNow.cs.uic.edu> writes:
>Colin B. wrote:
>> Alan Coopersmith <alanc@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
>>
>>>"Shampoo" <shamy@ptbo.igs.net> writes in comp.security.unix:
>Not to mention (well, I'm going to mention it), nobody uses telnet
>anymore.
Maybe in 5 to 10 years time that statement will be true.
But at the moment the number of machines running Telnet and ftp (both of which
send passwords in clear text) far exceeds the number running ssh and sftp.
What you probably meant was that nobody should be using Telnet if they can
avoid it. The problem being that you only control your own machines not all the
machines you may need to access or transfer files to outside of your
organisation.
David Webb
VMS and Unix team leader
CCSS
Middlesex University
>For one thing, no back door is needed as it puts out passwords
>in the clear on the network.
>
>Jon
- Previous message: Jon A. Solworth: "Re: National security backdoor."
- In reply to: Jon A. Solworth: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Next in thread: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Reply: Nick Maclaren: "Re: National security backdoor."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|