Re: Hardening a Solaris system.
From: Dr. David Kirkby (see_my_signature_for_my_real_address_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/28/03
- Previous message: David Magda: "Re: Hardening a Solaris system."
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: Hardening a Solaris system."
- Next in thread: Philippe: "Re: Hardening a Solaris system."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Nov 2003 08:39:59 -0800
Rich Teer <rich.teer@rite-group.com> wrote in message news:<Pine.SOL.4.58.0311262140490.507@zaphod.rite-group.com>...
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> > realise almost everyone uses port 80 (with a few using 8080), so it's
> > not something that one can easily change. But it does seem an
> > inappropiate port if it would be possible to lauch a webserver that
> > never runs as root, by changing the port. Am I missing something here?
>
> Not at all. In theory, you're corrrect, but given that port 80
> is now enshrined as THE http port, you'll make life more difficult
> for your users, because you'll always have to quote the port number
> in URLs.
Which is what I said - or at least was trying to say. I realise now
its too late to change from port 80, but with hindsight is seems
inappropiate.
- Previous message: David Magda: "Re: Hardening a Solaris system."
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: Hardening a Solaris system."
- Next in thread: Philippe: "Re: Hardening a Solaris system."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|