Re: Secure distribution
From: all mail refused (elvis_at_notatla.org.uk)
Date: 09/13/03
- Next message: jcalasa_at_not-for-mail.com: "Re: Department of Homeland "Security", Special Interests vs. the Public Interest"
- Previous message: /dev/rob0: "Re: Secure distribution"
- In reply to: Justin Shaffer: "Re: Secure distribution"
- Next in thread: /dev/rob0: "Re: Secure distribution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 12 Sep 2003 22:03:50 GMT
In article <120920031229498407%shafferj@mac.com>, Justin Shaffer wrote:
>need to make available to the outside world. What type of network will
>the machine be deployed in? Do you have the luxury of a firewall, or
>will you be using iptables or something similar on the machine itself?
Firewalls don't do a lot for webservers as far as web traffic is concerned
at least if you can keep to the ideal of offering only one service to
the public.
I do think they're important for stopping unexpected outbound traffic.
>> I use Mandrake as a desktop system, but wonder if other distributions such as
>> Trustix (www.trustix.net) or Openna (www.openna.com) offer better security
>> for running a server.
Immunix and OpenBSD are my choices. Both of these have some protection for
buggy software - the main flaw in moderately well-configured systems.
-- <rosannetuerlk@ifrance.com> http://www.ulikeit.biz/promo.php?id= <joy_edit@mail.online.sh.cn> is over quota
- Next message: jcalasa_at_not-for-mail.com: "Re: Department of Homeland "Security", Special Interests vs. the Public Interest"
- Previous message: /dev/rob0: "Re: Secure distribution"
- In reply to: Justin Shaffer: "Re: Secure distribution"
- Next in thread: /dev/rob0: "Re: Secure distribution"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|