Re: Question Please Help!
phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
Date: 05/22/03
- Previous message: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- In reply to: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- Next in thread: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- Reply: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:13:29 +0000 (UTC)
Wartan Hachaturow <wart@softhome.net> wrote:
> Bit Twister wrote:
>>> Is Unix security better than Windows?
>> Yes
> I wouldn't answer this question with such a confidence.
I would.
>>> Why is that?
>> Security is in the design of the system.
> Really? Do you really think that, for example, having an uid 0
> account with the ultimate power is "secure"?
There is always a need for "elevated privilegies". If that is
done "the unix way" or with a zillion discrete "privs" ( interacting
in strange and unforessen ways) is a design descition. I think ( but
that is an opinion) unix made the right descition.
>>> What makes it better?
>> None of the software allows the regular user to install malware
>> which can impact anyone else on the system.
Are you joking ???
> Consider Windows NT and successors. Same argument applies.
> "Security" is a word with a really, really broad range of meanings.
> Yes, Unix-oriented services are generally written in a more secure
> way, thus having less bugs that may lead to security problems.
> Generally -- because I won't speak for every single piece of software
> on Earth that runs on MS Windows or on Unix.
> Yes, Unix systems are _generally_ being administered by skilled
> people, and thus are more secure (by means of, for example, a number
> of open unneeded tcp ports) -- but trust me, there are plenty of
> lame root's out there, who's systems are less secure then Windows 98
> unfirewalled on the Internet.
> Yes, Windows-based systems require more work to stay up-to-date with
> serivce packs, etc. and more work to get tuned to a "somewhat secure,
> according to the current needs status", but that's how Microsoft
> treats it. Skilled Windows admin may make it hard to break.
> Most of the security problems on Windows come from the Microsoft's
> idea that comfort is prevalent over security -- that's why, for example,
> Outlook by default executes attachments. Unix isn't (generally, again)
> meant to be used and administrated by a housewife.
Aggree
> So, It Depends :)
Aggree
> --
> Regards, Wartan.
--
Peter Håkanson
IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.
- Previous message: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- In reply to: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- Next in thread: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- Reply: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|