Re: Question Please Help!

phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
Date: 05/22/03

  • Next message: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"
    Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:13:29 +0000 (UTC)
    
    

    Wartan Hachaturow <wart@softhome.net> wrote:
    > Bit Twister wrote:

    >>> Is Unix security better than Windows?
    >> Yes

    > I wouldn't answer this question with such a confidence.
    I would.

    >>> Why is that?
    >> Security is in the design of the system.

    > Really? Do you really think that, for example, having an uid 0
    > account with the ultimate power is "secure"?
    There is always a need for "elevated privilegies". If that is
    done "the unix way" or with a zillion discrete "privs" ( interacting
    in strange and unforessen ways) is a design descition. I think ( but
    that is an opinion) unix made the right descition.

    >>> What makes it better?
    >> None of the software allows the regular user to install malware
    >> which can impact anyone else on the system.

    Are you joking ???

    > Consider Windows NT and successors. Same argument applies.

    > "Security" is a word with a really, really broad range of meanings.
    > Yes, Unix-oriented services are generally written in a more secure
    > way, thus having less bugs that may lead to security problems.
    > Generally -- because I won't speak for every single piece of software
    > on Earth that runs on MS Windows or on Unix.
    > Yes, Unix systems are _generally_ being administered by skilled
    > people, and thus are more secure (by means of, for example, a number
    > of open unneeded tcp ports) -- but trust me, there are plenty of
    > lame root's out there, who's systems are less secure then Windows 98
    > unfirewalled on the Internet.
    > Yes, Windows-based systems require more work to stay up-to-date with
    > serivce packs, etc. and more work to get tuned to a "somewhat secure,
    > according to the current needs status", but that's how Microsoft
    > treats it. Skilled Windows admin may make it hard to break.
    > Most of the security problems on Windows come from the Microsoft's
    > idea that comfort is prevalent over security -- that's why, for example,
    > Outlook by default executes attachments. Unix isn't (generally, again)
    > meant to be used and administrated by a housewife.

    Aggree

    > So, It Depends :)
    Aggree

    > --
    > Regards, Wartan.

    -- 
    Peter Håkanson         
            IPSec  Sverige      ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
               Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
    	   remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.
    

  • Next message: Wartan Hachaturow: "Re: Question Please Help!"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: The Myth of the secure Mac
      ... OEM Windows XP Home goes for a bit under $100. ... >> secure than Home. ... Though this really has nothing to do with security. ... Microsoft counts on third-party developers to provide more ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: The Myth of the secure Mac
      ... >>> secure than Home. ... Though this really has nothing to do with security. ... >>> I, on the other hand, was speaking about overall Windows security, not ... I do believe that Microsoft could adjust their prices for the ...
      (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
    • Re: Any Way to Run Windows 2000 From Read-Only CD?
      ... Your point regarding infecting the computer during runtime when the disk is ... Now, regarding UNIX versus Windows, I try to have a balanced view. ... administrator can isolate those and secure them. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.security)
    • Re: Windows Is Now More Secure Than Linux
      ... >OpenSSL is compiled into just about every 'secure' application in the Unix ... You know, a lot of people see me as a "Windows defender", mainly because I pop ... The solution, if there is one, to security problems, is to choose a supplier ...
      (comp.security.misc)
    • RE: [inbox] Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: Linux (in)security
      ... When you have inherently more secure code in OS's ... "Windows" includes all the applications that come with Windows, ... Which is why they release security advisories for things like kernel ... This is why wu-ftpd keeps having new vulns discovered every year, ...
      (Full-Disclosure)