Re: CIRT Advisory CA-2003-0401: /dev/null Vulnerability
From: Kasper Dupont (kasperd@daimi.au.dk)
Date: 04/03/03
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: chkrootkit error on install"
- Previous message: Lew Pitcher: "Re: SRLOAD"
- In reply to: Ian Kluft: "Re: CIRT Advisory CA-2003-0401: /dev/null Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: D. Stussy: "Re: CIRT Advisory CA-2003-0401: /dev/null Vulnerability"
- Reply: D. Stussy: "Re: CIRT Advisory CA-2003-0401: /dev/null Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Kasper Dupont <kasperd@daimi.au.dk> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 10:40:42 +0200
Ian Kluft wrote:
>
> And the implausibility of a /dev/null
> vulnerability was supposed to be a giveaway for some too.
Absolutely. My first thought when I saw the subject was that an
April Fools was more likely than a /dev/null vulnurarbility. And
the list of possible damages was indeed proof enough for me that
I had been right at first.
-- Kasper Dupont -- der bruger for meget tid på usenet. For sending spam use mailto:aaarep@daimi.au.dk for(_=52;_;(_%5)||(_/=5),(_%5)&&(_-=2))putchar(_);
- Next message: Kasper Dupont: "Re: chkrootkit error on install"
- Previous message: Lew Pitcher: "Re: SRLOAD"
- In reply to: Ian Kluft: "Re: CIRT Advisory CA-2003-0401: /dev/null Vulnerability"
- Next in thread: D. Stussy: "Re: CIRT Advisory CA-2003-0401: /dev/null Vulnerability"
- Reply: D. Stussy: "Re: CIRT Advisory CA-2003-0401: /dev/null Vulnerability"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|