Re: getting around Ken Thompson's compiler Trojan
From: Alan J Rosenthal (flaps@dgp.toronto.edu)
Date: 01/28/03
- Previous message: Barry Margolin: "Re: getting around Ken Thompson's compiler Trojan"
- In reply to: Richard Caley: "Re: getting around Ken Thompson's compiler Trojan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: flaps@dgp.toronto.edu (Alan J Rosenthal) Date: 28 Jan 2003 17:11:42 GMT
Richard Caley <MYFIRSTNAME@MYLASTNAME.org.uk> writes:
>Barry Margolin writes:
>> BTW, not only does the compiler have to recognize itself, but it also has
>> to recognize the login program, so it can reinsert the backdoor.
>
>The little nerd who lives in my head is jumping up and down and making
>me post the fact that recognising the compiler is almost certainly an
>undecidable problem.
Oh, of course it is. Ken Thompson never claimed to have solved it.
The claimed trojan horse in the compiler was highly that-compiler-specific.
Actually, I'm not sure I should agree that "recognizing the compiler is an
undecidable problem", because I'm not sure it's a well-defined problem,
because "the compiler" is not well-defined. So it may be even worse than the
little nerd who lives in your head noticed.
-- very frequently asked questions at ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/faqs/computer-security/most-common-qs
- Next message: Jim: "A "send email" utility?"
- Previous message: Barry Margolin: "Re: getting around Ken Thompson's compiler Trojan"
- In reply to: Richard Caley: "Re: getting around Ken Thompson's compiler Trojan"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]