Re: privacy on Unix-servers

From: steve (icestore@web.de)
Date: 01/23/03 

From: icestore@web.de (steve)
Date: 23 Jan 2003 09:36:59 -0800

> > Very probably you can't know how this is in my special case, but maybe
> > there are some standards in the Unix-OS architecture that make an
> > intrusion into the privacy impossible.
>
> PGP will take you very far, and this on _any_ architecture.

What do you mean by PGP will take me very far ?
Do you mean it can protect my data on the server?

btw: Is the ZIP-encrypting routine version2.7 as safe as PGP?
 ...or can you call it safe even if it is not as good as PGP?

Relevant Pages

  • RE: Re[2]: [Full-Disclosure] Would you trust these Emails (EBAY & PAYPAL)
    ... Mails from your ... pgp would be fairly safe if the user manages to decrypt the signature and manages to verify the *CORRECT* signature from the correct location. ... maybe the credit card co do have a red flag false credit numbers that can be and are being tracked like this ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: Suggested "safe" password length
    ... > I have a lifetime of experience keeping it safe. ... > Forum Systems PRESIDIO: PGP / XML GATEWAY APPLIANCE ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: One-Time_Pad
    ... > written but PGP is fairly old, widepread and highly scrutinized. ... > PGP message has very low overhead compared to some other protocols. ... I am not referring to the standards, just the de facto violation of the ... It's just ego. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Is PGP government-proof anymore?
    ... transparently into PGP messages. ... I AES encrypt my hard disk using secure doc and keep my PGP keys on a ... But I feel pretty safe. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: privacy on Unix-servers
    ... > btw: Is the ZIP-encrypting routine version2.7 as safe as PGP? ...
    (comp.security.unix)