Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?
From: Jeff Makey (jeff@sdsc.edu)
Date: 01/09/03
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Previous message: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- In reply to: Kirt : "telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Next in thread: Mr. Uh Clem: "Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: jeff@sdsc.edu (Jeff Makey) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:18:15 +0000 (UTC)
In article <6pudnW0zusHrq4GjXTWcow@news.io.com>,
Kirt "Loki" Dankmyer <xiombarg@fnord.io.com> wrote:
>I need a telnet replacement that prevents hackers from snooping
>passwords but allowd me to give back-door acces to our security group, so
>they can confirm I'm not sending DURTEE PEECTURES or steamy emails.
Use telnet to connect to an internal host provided by the "security"
group, and ssh from there out through the firewall.
:: Jeff Makey
jeff@sdsc.edu
Department of Tautological Pleonasms and Superfluous Redundancies Department
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Previous message: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- In reply to: Kirt : "telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Next in thread: Mr. Uh Clem: "Re: telnet replacement - not ssh?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|