Re: route add $attacker localhost - viable?
From: those who know me have no need of my name (not-a-real-address@usa.net)
Date: 12/17/02
- Next message: Ric: "Puttygen saved keys and FreeBSD ssh"
- Previous message: Tc: "route add $attacker localhost - viable?"
- In reply to: Tc: "route add $attacker localhost - viable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net> Date: 17 Dec 2002 08:29:02 GMT
in comp.security.unix i read:
>I've been told (and have even seen the odd comment posted) that you
>can route them to /dev/null.
[instead of using packet filters]
>Is that what "route add $SomeIpAddress localhost" does?
that's an apt analog. (it's not exactly the same, but it has the same
end-effect.) some systems handle routing table entries much better than
they do packet filters.
-- bringing you boring signatures for 17 years
- Next message: Ric: "Puttygen saved keys and FreeBSD ssh"
- Previous message: Tc: "route add $attacker localhost - viable?"
- In reply to: Tc: "route add $attacker localhost - viable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
