Re: unknown tcp/ip connections.
From: Barry Margolin (barmar@genuity.net)
Date: 11/21/02
- Next message: Michel De Rouck: "SECURITY PROBLEM OR NOT"
- Previous message: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: RCP- How Safe is it to Allow?"
- In reply to: eddepet: "Re: unknown tcp/ip connections."
- Next in thread: eddepet: "Re: unknown tcp/ip connections."
- Reply: eddepet: "Re: unknown tcp/ip connections."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:55:38 GMT
In article <arj20k$5do$1@info.service.rug.nl>,
eddepet <edwin.knol@prive.ordina.nl> wrote:
>Barry,
>Sure, is this readable for you?
No, it looks just like the previous version.
Here's the first line of your table:
>226 nat-services-fw.net.nltree.nl.23226 24840 0 9660
>0 TIME_WAIT
Does this look like what you pasted? It's clearly missing a chunk of the
first column. Actually, I'm not even sure that "226" at the beginning of
the line is from the first column, since it's the tail end of the same port
in the second column (it seems pretty unlikely that the local and remote
ports would be the same for random ports like this).
-- Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net Genuity, Woburn, MA *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups. Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
- Next message: Michel De Rouck: "SECURITY PROBLEM OR NOT"
- Previous message: phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: RCP- How Safe is it to Allow?"
- In reply to: eddepet: "Re: unknown tcp/ip connections."
- Next in thread: eddepet: "Re: unknown tcp/ip connections."
- Reply: eddepet: "Re: unknown tcp/ip connections."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|