Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)

From: Faux_Pseudo (Faux_Pseudo@yahoo.comERCIAL)
Date: 06/27/02 

From: Faux_Pseudo <Faux_Pseudo@yahoo.comERCIAL>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 02:43:51 GMT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --(Once apon a time, in comp.security.unix,)--
                --(Chronos Tachyon said it like only they can.)--
> Spam, spam, spam, spam, Spam, spam, spam, spam, ...

I had thought about including a note that this should only be used on
local networks for another reason but opted not to mention it because
I didn't want to complicate the issue too much. Looks like spaming
would be another reason to keep it local as well.

>
> And, although an "X-Lieing-User: yes" header (in the fine spelling tradition
> of HTTP's "Referer:", perhaps?)

In the fine spelling tradition of Andrew Jackson, see my sig for more
info.

> To make a long story short,
<snip>
> only valid answer is, "Request
> that the recipient reply to it manually."

And they will fail to reply.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9GnpCkjt2bc9NoGsRArrPAJ9SV1tGqUB0dTd6lX6avuMDXL9J4ACfQ7ox
F1mTyMfBvRCT3NkzC2XdmzM=
=aJY3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 

-- 
 .-'))    _  UIN= 66618055  _    (('-.  | It's a damn poor mind that 
' ..-  .:" )               ( ":.  -.. ' | can only think of one way to
 ((,,_;'.;'                 ';. ';_,,)) | spell a word.
       ((_.;'*Faux_Pseudo*':._))        | - Andrew Jackson

Relevant Pages