Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium
From: Doug McIntyre (merlyn@visi.com)Date: 06/26/02
- Next message: Faux_Pseudo: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Previous message: michael: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- In reply to: srt@nospam.unt.edu: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- Next in thread: Geoff Lane: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- Reply: Geoff Lane: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Doug McIntyre <merlyn@visi.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:21:53 GMT
srt@nospam.unt.edu writes:
>Geoff Lane <zzassgl@twirl.mcc.ac.uk> wrote:
>> blunted1 <dank@neverschwag.com> wrote:
>>> Securing content via hardware, will it work? I think not.
>>> I just wanted to get the *NIX spin on Microsoft's latest way to control the
>>> desktop. Will the open source community follow with an equal?
>> It wont work because a program has no idea if it's running on h/w or s/w.
>> Everything a program may check can be faked. We don't do full emulation
>> much today because it's slow but with the Crusoe CPU you can fake any CPU ID
>> you like just by writing a bit of firmware/assembler to emulate all the x86
>> ID instructions.
>And if there are cryptographic keys embedded in the hardware, and they
>don't tell you what they are, how do you plan on emulating the
>hardware?
Just like the crypto key embedded into the Microsoft Xbox?
-- Doug McIntyre merlyn@visi.com Network Engineer/Jack of All Trades Vector Internet Services, Inc.
- Next message: Faux_Pseudo: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Previous message: michael: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- In reply to: srt@nospam.unt.edu: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- Next in thread: Geoff Lane: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- Reply: Geoff Lane: "Re: Microsoft's Jihad - Palladium"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|