Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)

From: Christopher Browne (cbbrowne@acm.org)
Date: 06/24/02 

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Date: 24 Jun 2002 17:45:19 GMT

Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when robert@bonomi.invalid would write:
> In article <af7c2p$c39ek$1@ID-125932.news.dfncis.de>,
> Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> wrote:
>>
> [[.. munch ..]]
>>
>>By the way, I'd think that Jun 23 23:31:48, when BigLiar apparently
>>checked email, is _before_ Jun 22 23:47:31, which is when the message
>>in question was sent. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't _think_ the two
>>messages pulled in Exhibit C include the one described in Exhibits A
>>and B.
>
> As you're the second to make this mistake, I'm going to point out the
> "true facts". Note the _date_ on each timestamp. "Checked mail" is
> almost TWENTY FOUR HOURS _AFTER_ the mail was sent.

My bad. Those timestamps are nonetheless RATHER interesting,
appearing to be rather late at night for both the send and the
receive.

The rest of it I'll stand by :-).

And if anyone wants _real_ entertainment, they could consider installing
Postfix/qmail, and invoking the Wrath of DJB :-). 

-- 
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.enworbbc@" "sirhc"))
http://cbbrowne.com/info/linuxdistributions.html
State opinions in the syntax of fact: "...as well as the bug in LMFS
where you have to expunge directories to get rid of files....."
-- from the Symbolics Guidelines for Sending Mail