Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)
From: John Armstrong (ja@ggrove.swinternet.co.uk)Date: 06/24/02
- Next message: robert@bonomi.invalid: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Previous message: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Next in thread: robert@bonomi.invalid: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: John Armstrong <ja@ggrove.swinternet.co.uk> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 17:07:39 +0100
On 24 Jun 2002 14:58:34 GMT, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
wrote:
>By the way, I'd think that Jun 23 23:31:48, when BigLiar apparently
>checked email, is _before_ Jun 22 23:47:31, which is when the message
>in question was sent. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't _think_ the two
>messages pulled in Exhibit C include the one described in Exhibits A
>and B.
You are second person to say that. Am I missing something, because it
looks like he checked for mail 23 hours 44 minutes after the message
was sent.
-- John
- Next message: robert@bonomi.invalid: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Previous message: Dragan Cvetkovic: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Next in thread: robert@bonomi.invalid: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]