Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)
From: Dragan Cvetkovic (d1r2a3g4a5n.NOSPAM@soli99ton.com)Date: 06/24/02
- Next message: John Armstrong: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Next in thread: John Armstrong: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Dragan Cvetkovic <d1r2a3g4a5n.NOSPAM@soli99ton.com> Date: 24 Jun 2002 11:09:46 -0400
Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes:
> By the way, I'd think that Jun 23 23:31:48, when BigLiar apparently
> checked email, is _before_ Jun 22 23:47:31, which is when the message
> in question was sent.
Huh, there is almost 24 hours difference between them.
Bye, Dragan
-- Dragan Cvetkovic,To be or not to be is true. G. Boole No it isn't. L. E. J. Brouwer
- Next message: John Armstrong: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- In reply to: Christopher Browne: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Next in thread: John Armstrong: "Re: "proving" a user received an email (good gosh)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]