Re: Please advise
From: those who know me have no need of my name (not-a-real-address@usa.net)Date: 05/28/02
- Next message: Andrew Carson: "Re: ANTISEC IS NOT FOR YOU"
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: what ports does sendmail /popper use?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Adrian Smith: "Please advise"
- Next in thread: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Please advise"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Please advise"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net> Date: 28 May 2002 06:11:17 GMT
<acrqjs$itr$1@snaffles.demon.co.uk> divulged:
> I appear to have been hacked - which I find a little puzzling.
>Restoring the affected files, upgrading my system and removing
>all unwanted services is annoying but doable,
and likely to be ineffective.
>why would anyone have chosen me as a target?
most likely you where chosen specifically. a random scan probably noticed
an insecure service running.
-- bringing you boring signatures for 17 years
- Next message: Andrew Carson: "Re: ANTISEC IS NOT FOR YOU"
- Previous message: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: what ports does sendmail /popper use?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Adrian Smith: "Please advise"
- Next in thread: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Please advise"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Please advise"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]