Re: Interesting Apache logs

From: Alan J. Flavell (flavell@mail.cern.ch)
Date: 03/26/02

  • Next message: bsduser: "Re: ICMP Redirect interpretation"

    From: "Alan J. Flavell" <flavell@mail.cern.ch>
    Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 01:00:49 +0100
    
    

    On Mar 25, Barry Margolin inscribed on the eternal scroll:

    > I remember the furor that arose last year when many ISPs started blocking
    > port 80 inbound to residential customers, to prevent propagation of Code
    > Red and NIMDA. They're damned if they do, damned if they don't.

    Sounds as if they hadn't thought-through their AUP beforehand.

    > What you should do is report the problem to the Abuse departments of the
    > appropriate ISPs.

    Who'll then send back an anodyne recorded statement saying they've
    passed the victim's details on to their abusive customer and can't
    tell you anything more about what happened.

    > Then they can track down the customers and tell them to
    > fix their systems.

    ipchains does a nice job, but I find it works best with large
    netblocks. *)

    I'm sorry: we (back at the campus - at cern I'm just another user and
    it's none of my business what their security scanner gets up to) try
    not to wait for victims to complain: known abuses are tested for, and
    nipped in the bud. I'm not saying that cases don't slip through, of
    course they do, but I'd like to see a more pro-active approach from
    other providers.

    FYI our network provider tried nearly 500 different ways to get our
    mailer to relay spam over the past weekend. If they succeeded, we'll
    get a formal notice, and if we fail to attend to it, we'd get shut
    down.

    And (with my deputy postmaster hat on) I'm all in favour of it.

    ttfn

    *) please adjust your irony threshold as necessary



    Relevant Pages

    • RE: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns
      ... > possible for our customers. ... ISPs, ... The bitter pill for the clueful is that those people that run a firewall ... appliance or build their own Linux/BSD firewall for their home network ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: [fw-wiz] The home user problem returns
      ... > ISPs have a completely different place in the security stack - your ... > job is to carry goodness and badness; ... I agree that the ISP's place in the security stack is different than ... The fact that ISPs are now seeing enough pressure (from customers, RBLs, ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: cheap alternative to plusnet
      ... reasons for making this statement. ... I have seen a number of low end ISPs recommended at various times. ... that offer phone calls and internet access, ... customers, without spending as much as these "big boys" on TV ads. ...
      (uk.telecom.broadband)
    • Re: OT: Charging by the Byte
      ... ISPs used to meter data use and were always losing customers to competitors offering "unlimited" packages. ... That same week, Comcast said that it would expand on a strategy it uses to manage Internet traffic: slowing down the connections of the heaviest users, so-called bandwidth hogs, at peak times. ...
      (alt.smokers.pipes)
    • Re: Way OT - comparison of ISP email size limits?
      ... about get their heads around sticking an attachment onto an email but FTP ... We ourselves got snagged with this when we moved ISPs to ... >> recommendations to customers. ... > not recommend running your own mail server with no limit. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)

  • Quantcast