Re: Interesting Apache logs
From: Alan J. Flavell (flavell@mail.cern.ch)Date: 03/25/02
- Next message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Previous message: Alan J Rosenthal: "comp.security.unix and comp.security.misc frequently asked questions"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Next in thread: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Reply: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Alan J. Flavell" <flavell@mail.cern.ch> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:28:34 +0100
On Mar 25, Barry Margolin inscribed on the eternal scroll:
> I suspect most of the infected machines are not operated by professional
> administrators, but are simply home machines. They're more likely ignorant
> than lazy.
Indeed. However, all of them are connected somehow to the Internet,
by some provider who's supposed to know what they're doing, and who
could - and should - be preventing their users from abusing the 'net.
(My home campus for example is monitoring traffic for evidence of
code-red and similar probes, and is known to have blocked the IP of
several infected stations pending resolution of the problem.)
- Next message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Previous message: Alan J Rosenthal: "comp.security.unix and comp.security.misc frequently asked questions"
- In reply to: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Next in thread: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Reply: Barry Margolin: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Reply: those who know me have no need of my name: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]