Re: Interesting Apache logs
From: Barry Margolin (barmar@genuity.net)Date: 03/25/02
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ICMP Redirect interpretation"
- In reply to: Ivan Kelly: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 21:10:18 GMT
In article <slrna9uunr.29i.ivan@fandango.e23host.com>,
Ivan Kelly <ivan@nospam.ivankelly.net> wrote:
>In article <3C9E9C07.A891705@mindspring.com>, Clark wrote:
>> My business website is getting the same thing. I wonder what percentage
>> of the total traffic on the internet is this sort of thing. I've been
>> getting it for quite a while, and it constitutes the bulk of the
>> requests to my site.
>>
>a more interesting question would be, are hosting companies entitled to
>compensation due to this kind of thing. bandwidth costs money and if
>this is wasting bandwidth are people not entitled to compo.
I think most hosting companies charge their customers based on the amount
of traffic to/from their servers. So the cost is presumably being funneled
to them. The question becomes: are customers of hosting companies entitled
to compenstation?
>only problem is who is to fault? microsoft or lazy network admins?
I suspect most of the infected machines are not operated by professional
administrators, but are simply home machines. They're more likely ignorant
than lazy.
-- Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net Genuity, Woburn, MA *** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups. Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
- Next message: Alan J. Flavell: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ICMP Redirect interpretation"
- In reply to: Ivan Kelly: "Re: Interesting Apache logs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]