Re: Security Proportional to Risk (was: IBM Mainframe at home)
From: Steve O'Hara-Smith (steveo@eircom.net)Date: 03/05/02
- Previous message: Charles Williams: "Re: Admin CD v1 released"
- Maybe in reply to: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Security Proportional to Risk (was: IBM Mainframe at home)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steveo@eircom.net> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 08:17:16 +0100
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 22:30:18 -0800
Jim Stewart <jstewart@jkmicro.com> wrote:
JS> And did they have a calibrated test tongue to use in the certification
JS> lab?
That would be an ISO standard worth reading :)
JS> I recall a British Telecomm safety standard that required you to probe
JS> enclosure openings with a defined "test finger"
I do hope that test finger was modeled on a two year old (come to
that the tongue should have been a 6 month babies tongue not an executive).
--
C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors
The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun
You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see:
| http://www.sohara.org/
- Next message: none@nobody.net: "IPchains Troubles"
- Previous message: Charles Williams: "Re: Admin CD v1 released"
- Maybe in reply to: Anne & Lynn Wheeler: "Security Proportional to Risk (was: IBM Mainframe at home)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|