Re: strange firewall log

From: Barry Margolin (barmar@genuity.net)
Date: 02/22/02


From: Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:41:34 GMT

In article <fb97c54b.0202212333.527c149d@posting.google.com>,
keith <keith@w-o-i.com> wrote:
>Yes 192.168.0.1 is the internal interface and Samba is configured with
>the interface set to the internal interface.
>You said this is a reply to a netbios request. From where is this
>request from my LAN or from the internet.
>I thought it was from ouside?

It was from a machine that claimed its address is 1.0.0.1. Whether it came
from inside our outside is impossible for us to determine.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: strange firewall log
    ... the interface set to the internal interface. ... You said this is a reply to a netbios request. ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Re: strange firewall log
    ... >>Yes 192.168.0.1 is the internal interface and Samba is configured with ... >>the interface set to the internal interface. ... >>You said this is a reply to a netbios request. ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Samba domain master browser bound to wrong interface
    ... I altered my Samba config to correctly listen only on the ... *Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup SIMBA, ... correct internal interface but every attempt to become the ...
    (Fedora)