Re: PF keywords,

From: Isak Lyberth (ily@cip-global.com)
Date: 02/21/02 

From: "Isak Lyberth" <ily@cip-global.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:37:15 +0100

You should check here to see the syntax for most PF things

http://openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#PF

Regards Isak
"sigsimaack" <sigsimaack@subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2002.02.21.03.58.27.482076.15078@subdimension.com...
> I am wondering if anyone can
> tell me the PF keywords to manipulate
> the following packets ?
>
> loose source route
> strict source route
> fragments
>
> and how to use the label keyword
> it seems no matter how i use it i get
> a syntax error
>
> thanks much

Relevant Pages

  • Re: PF keywords,
    ... You should check here to see the syntax for most PF things ... > tell me the PF keywords to manipulate ... > strict source route ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Re: Extending Python Syntax with @
    ... confusing ways of extending an existing syntax. ... provide the same defaults as our current print statement, ... What I'm saying is, rather than add new keywords, it would be better ... where symbols themselves convey many complex meanings. ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Lisp and Scheme with fewer parentheses
    ... syntax, keywords in my case and whitespace in your case. ... setq then progn ... In which forum was that consensus reached? ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: number ranges
    ... Alex Martelli wrote: ... putting it that way, the new syntax actually costs 1 keystroke, or saves 1 if you put spaces after the commas in the range expression. ... Does it add enough clarity and ease of understanding to justify two new keywords? ... Ruby uses both .. ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: expanding macros and passing the results to other macros
    ... I'm still struggling with working at the syntax level though. ... at compile-time lookup the runtime value of, in the example, keywords. ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)