Re: dumb++ security
From: David Means (dmeans-usenet@the-means.net)Date: 02/21/02
- Next message: Michael Soukup: "Re: SNMP Vulnerability Hype"
- Previous message: Ross Oliver: "Re: dumb++ security"
- In reply to: Buffy The Cache Coder: "dumb++ security"
- Next in thread: Ross Oliver: "Re: dumb++ security"
- Reply: Ross Oliver: "Re: dumb++ security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: David Means <dmeans-usenet@the-means.net> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 20:26:06 -0500
Encrypt the usernames/passwords using a strong encryption algorithm.
Create a machine fingerprint and make the file unusable if the machine
fingerprint doesn't match the one in the file.
David
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:50:51 -0500, Buffy The Cache Coder Articulated:
> Hello.
>
> I need some suggestions on how to make my company's product more secure
> from hackers.
{ snip }
-- No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.-- UCE Stricly forbidden! See UCE/Spam Policy here: http://www.the-means.net/Spam-Policy.html
- Next message: Michael Soukup: "Re: SNMP Vulnerability Hype"
- Previous message: Ross Oliver: "Re: dumb++ security"
- In reply to: Buffy The Cache Coder: "dumb++ security"
- Next in thread: Ross Oliver: "Re: dumb++ security"
- Reply: Ross Oliver: "Re: dumb++ security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]