Re: Unix vs. Windows for Security
From: svek (svekSPAM-NO-MORE@gmx.net)Date: 02/20/02
- Next message: Philip J. Koenig: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Previous message: Bruno Wolff III: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Maybe in reply to: Colin: "Unix vs. Windows for Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: svek <svekSPAM-NO-MORE@gmx.net> Date: 20 Feb 2002 14:12:58 GMT
NoSpam@NoSpam.net (Mike) wrote in
news:3c724d17.57955425@news.alterdial.uu.net:
> Like the UPnP bug in XP's default install?
> http://news.com.com/2100-1001-277291.html?legacy=cnet
>
> Here is a spot to find more info on Windows security.
> www.trustworthycomputing.com
:)
Yes among other things...
I mean that system is for future use as far as I have understood...
Why would they ship it enabled? Why would they ship it at all at this
point?
Why not leave it as an update for the few who wants it on their website?
/svek
- Next message: Philip J. Koenig: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Previous message: Bruno Wolff III: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Maybe in reply to: Colin: "Unix vs. Windows for Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|