Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats
From: Jeffrey Siegal (jbs@quiotix.com)Date: 02/13/02
- Next message: Jeffrey Siegal: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Siegal: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- In reply to: spp@cs.berkeley.edu: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Next in thread: spp@cs.berkeley.edu: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Reply: spp@cs.berkeley.edu: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Jeffrey Siegal <jbs@quiotix.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:55:30 -0800
spp@cs.berkeley.edu wrote:
> I understand that if you buy for example a DVD player, you are
> supposedly agreeing not to reverse engineer it, or even to tap
> off internal signals so as to listen and view discs.
I'm not sure you're *agreeing* to any such thing, but there is a law
that prohibits you from doing things like that (or anythign else) if
they constitute circumvention of an access control mechanism. So you
don't have to *agree* to it; the law applies to you regardless.
- Next message: Jeffrey Siegal: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Previous message: Jeffrey Siegal: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- In reply to: spp@cs.berkeley.edu: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Next in thread: spp@cs.berkeley.edu: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Reply: spp@cs.berkeley.edu: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]