Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats
From: Dimitri Maziuk (dima@127.0.0.1)Date: 02/12/02
- Next message: Hasan Diwan From:: "Re: port 18000"
- Previous message: Dave Korn: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- In reply to: Marty Fouts: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Next in thread: Warren L Holybee: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Dimitri Maziuk <dima@127.0.0.1> Date: 12 Feb 2002 18:30:57 GMT
On 11 Feb 2002 17:42:11 -0800, Marty Fouts wrote:
...
> I believe that Softman V Adobe is one of the reasons that the SPA is
> working so hard to get legislation that makes it clear that the
> licenses are enforcable.
Parse error: segmentation violation in /dev/brane,
core dumped !&^*#&&+++NO CARRIER
Dima
-- Surely there is a polite way to say FOAD. -- Shmuel Metz "Fornicate Off And Decease". -- Rik Steenwinkel
- Next message: Hasan Diwan From:: "Re: port 18000"
- Previous message: Dave Korn: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- In reply to: Marty Fouts: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Next in thread: Warren L Holybee: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
