Re: Nokia, Checkpoint, Stone, Linux, Pix
From: gaius.petronius (rut@linuxmail.org)Date: 01/23/02
- Next message: Kevin W. Thomas: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Previous message: Todd Knarr: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- In reply to: Erik Jan van Westen: "Re: Nokia, Checkpoint, Stone, Linux, Pix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: rut@linuxmail.org (gaius.petronius) Date: 22 Jan 2002 20:42:19 -0800
> > 2: am i correct in saying that the Nokia 650 essentially is a PC and
> > that a Linux machine running ipchains can do the same job better?
>
> Not with ipchains. iptables yes. iptables is stateful (and better at it
> than checkpoint 4.1).
iptables and ipchains are kernel modules. What feature(s) make(s) one
better than the other?
>
> > 3: does there a exist a *better* technology, a different hardware
> > platform, that outshines all of these firewalling methods?
>
> Have a look at ipf. (ip filter) from Darren Reed. It is blindingly fast
> on an appropriate sun. It will cost you for hardware though.
What makes it better? Do you have the url please?
>
> Look at OpenBSD with either ipf or pf. This too can run on a sun. There
> is no good technical reason not to go with iptables or ipf.
>
> EJ
Try telling that to the potatoes with pointy hair when they receive
laminated advertisements claiming to provide "hardware" firewalls.
- Next message: Kevin W. Thomas: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- Previous message: Todd Knarr: "Re: Microsoft finally acknowledges the security drumbeats"
- In reply to: Erik Jan van Westen: "Re: Nokia, Checkpoint, Stone, Linux, Pix"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|