Re: understanding chkrootkit: sshd section
From: davehinz@spamcop.netDate: 01/08/02
- Next message: Aaron Parks: "Re: Password Aging methods"
- Previous message: Richard L. Hamilton: "Re: Who have used utmpxname()?"
- In reply to: gaius.petronius: "Re: understanding chkrootkit: sshd section"
- Next in thread: lynx: "Re: understanding chkrootkit: sshd section"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: davehinz@spamcop.net Date: 08 Jan 2002 14:54:25 GMT
In comp.unix.admin gaius.petronius <rut@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> news-post@mcdh.co.uk (David Hart) wrote in message
>>
>> Adam was kind enough to answer your question - what's your problem? If
>> you had RTFM you would not only have got your answer sooner, you would've
>> saved the rest of us (cumulatively) a lot of time.
> you mean like the time you're wasting here being *wrong*?
> the FM didn't include the helpful comments of the other people on this
> newsgroup.
Lose the attitude... all you're going to get alot of this way, are
<PLONK>s.
- Next message: Aaron Parks: "Re: Password Aging methods"
- Previous message: Richard L. Hamilton: "Re: Who have used utmpxname()?"
- In reply to: gaius.petronius: "Re: understanding chkrootkit: sshd section"
- Next in thread: lynx: "Re: understanding chkrootkit: sshd section"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
