Re: scp UNBELIEVABLY slow
- From: Ignoramus10476 <ignoramus10476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:15:22 -0500
On 2008-03-29, NoStop <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hadron wrote:
John Thompson <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:I can imagine YOU doing that. Anyone with half a brain would just stick with
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.misc.]
On 2008-03-25, Frank <fb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ignoramus16148 wrote:
I am on a good network here. I need to copy a bunch of AVI from a
laptop to my basement server. Wired network. HTTP test yields about 6
megabytes per second transfer speed.
SCP is only doing 188 kB per second, or 36 times slower.
I am copying from Ubuntu Hardy to Fedora 7.
WTF, how can I debug this. Thanks.
Get a real OS.
Switch to Vista.
AFAIK, Vista doesn't include scp or any other secure file transfer
software at all.
Nonsense. You can install rsync on Windows too.
As well as ssh and scp and .....
Linux.
On the Windows XP computer that I use at work, I run X windows, the
whole works of xterms and binutils, perl, cron, and firefox.
That stuff actually works, but not quite as well as under Linux. For
example, you cannot access mounted network drives from cron.
i
.
- Prev by Date: Passwordless login via SSH
- Next by Date: Re: scp UNBELIEVABLY slow
- Previous by thread: Re: scp UNBELIEVABLY slow
- Next by thread: Re: scp UNBELIEVABLY slow
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|