Re: scp UNBELIEVABLY slow -- PLOT THICKENS
- From: Ignoramus16148 <ignoramus16148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:07:34 -0500
On 2008-03-25, NoStop <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bad security on YOUR local LAN?
Even if someone was downloading torrents through my wifi, it would
only account for a few megabits. So while your idea is interesting, I
do not think that it could account for it.
However, plot thickened.
My laptop was connected to the basement server through three gigabit
switches A, B, C. That's where I had this terrible performance.
I moved it to the basement where it is connected through switches C
and D (D is a 100 megabit switch).
Here, the performance improved dramatically to 3.9 megaBYTES per
second.
Go figure.
Why SCP was 36 times slower than HTTP going through A, B, C but not C
and D, is a mystery.
i
.
- Prev by Date: missing expected core file using ssh + command
- Next by Date: calling SSH from a HTML Application
- Previous by thread: missing expected core file using ssh + command
- Next by thread: calling SSH from a HTML Application
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
