Re: why is plink slower than ssh?
- From: Reggie Burnett <rykr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 11:32:22 -0600
Richard E. Silverman wrote:
"RB" == Reggie Burnett <rykr@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
RB> We use bitkeeper as our scm tool and all of our remote
RB> repositories are accessed with ssh. I work from Windows and use
RB> putty with svn with good success. I can also use plink with
RB> bitkeeper but it is a great deal slower than ssh from cygwin in
RB> doing the same job.
RB> The problem is that I can't get sshagent to work on Windows so I
RB> have to type in my passphrase everytime. I would like to use
RB> plink since I already have pageant running. Can someone explain
RB> why plink would be so much slower than ssh in doing this tunnel?
RB> We are talking about taking 2x-3x the time needed by cygwin ssh on
RB> the same machine talking to the same remote machine.
RB> Thanks!
It might be helpful to run plink -v and see where the slowdown occurs.
ok. I'll try that and report back.
.
- References:
- why is plink slower than ssh?
- From: Reggie Burnett
- Re: why is plink slower than ssh?
- From: Richard E. Silverman
- why is plink slower than ssh?
- Prev by Date: Re: why is plink slower than ssh?
- Next by Date: Re: why is plink slower than ssh?
- Previous by thread: Re: why is plink slower than ssh?
- Next by thread: Re: why is plink slower than ssh?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|