Re: Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- From: Grant <bugsplatter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:49:24 +1100
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:03:08 -0500, Lew Pitcher <Lew.Pitcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was wondering if there have been any security, ease-of-use, or other
qualitative comparisons performed between PuTTY and F-Secure. How secure
is PuTTY as compared to F-Secure? How reliable?
PuTTY is free, I've been using it for years. Simon Tathan only releases
PuTTY from his own site, for security. While the setup dialogs are a
little clunky, the program works without fuss here on localnet as well
as being my 'window to the world' for many years while using a remote
account on an IRIX-64 box.
I cannot make the comparison you ask, I have no reason to seek a different
ssh client (ssh is built into linux terminal session) -- using PuTTY since
last century.
Grant.
--
Memory fault -- brain fried
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- From: Chuck
- Re: Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- References:
- Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- From: Lew Pitcher
- Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- Prev by Date: Re: X.509 and ssh
- Next by Date: Re: Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- Previous by thread: Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- Next by thread: Re: Comparison between PuTTY and F-Secure
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|