Re: [Q] Eudora SSL Negotiation fails

From: Uwe Stoeckel (my_mail_at_gmx.com)
Date: 10/31/05 

Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:56:30 +0100

Richard!
On 30 Oct 2005 22:19:38 -0500, "Richard E. Silverman" <res@qoxp.net>
wrote:

>This newsgroup is about SSH, not SSL.

I am sorry.
I am not far enough in the matter to even know the difference between
SSH and SSL.

With apologies for any inconvenience caused,
Uwe 

-- 
Sachkunde kann eine lebhafte Diskussion nur behindern

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [Q] Eudora SSL Negotiation fails
    ... >>This newsgroup is about SSH, not SSL. ... > I am not far enough in the matter to even know the difference between ...
    (comp.security.ssh)
  • Re: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH
    ... Neither the SSL or the SSH ... SSH was made to be a secure remote terminal protocol, ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: RE: Telnet/SSL v SSH
    ... SSH is a secure login and shell ... SSH and SSL are apples and oranges. ... include secure use of networked applications, remote system administration, ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • Re: Cable for transfer of data?
    ... SSL /should/ mean. ... SSH has an SSH encryption similar to SSL. ... SSH does tunneling and encryption. ...
    (uk.comp.homebuilt)
  • Re: Error 0X800C0005
    ... they got somebody who actually helped them fix their ... No harm was intended, just expressing frustration. ... Apologies again to any I may have offended. ... I've tried various settings for SSL, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)