Re: bruteforce ssh
From: Richard E. Silverman (res_at_qoxp.net)
Date: 10/28/05
- Previous message: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- In reply to: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Next in thread: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Reply: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Oct 2005 02:23:25 -0400
>>>>> "ES" == Ertugrul Soeylemez <never@drwxr-xr-x.org> writes:
ES> Use another authentication scheme than passwords. I recommend
ES> public key authentication. This doesn't only make bruteforce
ES> attacks impossible
Well, impractical. :)
ES> but also man in the middle attacks.
It's worth noting that the SSH transport protocol already provides the
client MITM resistance -- and since the transport protocol normally
encapsulates the authentication protocol, this protection applies
regardless of the user authentication method employed (providing the
requirements of the particular key exchange are met, e.g. the hostkey is
properly verified). The publickey userauth method simply adds another
instance of MITM protection, this time for the server.
-- Richard Silverman res@qoxp.net
- Previous message: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- In reply to: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Next in thread: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Reply: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|