Re: wrong authentication protocol attempted
From: Jack Patteeuw (jjpatteeuw_at_nospam.net)
Date: 10/28/05
- Next message: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Previous message: Wolfgang Meiners: "Re: ssh as socks proxy"
- In reply to: Simon Tatham: "Re: wrong authentication protocol attempted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:04:38 GMT
Simon Tatham wrote:
>
> 0.56 is a security risk. You should upgrade to 0.58.
>
Done !
> Have you checked to see whether root's X authority file might also
> contain an XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 cookie for the same display number?
> If there were one lying around from a previous session, it would
> override the MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 one you just put in.
You hit the nail right on the head ! Thanks !
And an extra special thanks for PuTTY !! The best thing I can say about
it is "It just works !"
It works right, out of the box, first time, every time. I don't know
why anybody would use any other product.
PuTTY makes Windows work !
- Next message: Ertugrul Soeylemez: "Re: bruteforce ssh"
- Previous message: Wolfgang Meiners: "Re: ssh as socks proxy"
- In reply to: Simon Tatham: "Re: wrong authentication protocol attempted"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|