Re: Password camouflage in SSH, version 1
From: Richard E. Silverman (res_at_qoxp.net)
Date: 10/12/05
- Next message: Richard E Maine: "Re: Mac OSX -> linux x11Forwarding struggles, invalid name errors?"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: Mac OSX -> linux x11Forwarding struggles, invalid name errors?"
- In reply to: Simon Tatham: "Re: Password camouflage in SSH, version 1"
- Next in thread: Simon Tatham: "Re: Password camouflage in SSH, version 1"
- Reply: Simon Tatham: "Re: Password camouflage in SSH, version 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 12 Oct 2005 15:49:33 -0400
>>>>> "ST" == Simon Tatham <anakin@pobox.com> writes:
ST> It so happens that _most_ servers are written in
ST> C and hence treat NULs as end-of-string unless painstakingly told
ST> not to, but that behaviour isn't mandated by the standard (in fact
ST> strictly speaking you could probably argue that it's a _violation_
ST> of the standard).
Not disagreeing with anything, just commenting: actually, I don't see it
as a violation of the standard -- such a client is simply sending the
wrong password, and hoping the server is similarly buggy. :)
-- Richard Silverman res@qoxp.net
- Next message: Richard E Maine: "Re: Mac OSX -> linux x11Forwarding struggles, invalid name errors?"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: Mac OSX -> linux x11Forwarding struggles, invalid name errors?"
- In reply to: Simon Tatham: "Re: Password camouflage in SSH, version 1"
- Next in thread: Simon Tatham: "Re: Password camouflage in SSH, version 1"
- Reply: Simon Tatham: "Re: Password camouflage in SSH, version 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|