Re: PAM changing user name
From: Per Hedeland (per_at_hedeland.org)
Date: 08/19/05
- Previous message: Martin Paul: "Re: Password Guessing"
- In reply to: Darren Tucker: "Re: PAM changing user name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
In article
<43058e87$0$21073$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> Darren
Tucker <dtucker@gate.dodgy.net.au> writes:
>On 2005-08-18, Per Hedeland <per@hedeland.org> wrote:
>> In article
>><43049b52$0$21073$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> Darren
>> Tucker <dtucker@gate.dodgy.net.au> writes:
>>
>>>Having PAM map the username is not supported on any version. I'm not sure
>>>how much effort it would be to change (and I'm not sure how it would
>>>interact with privsep either).
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply - I tried 4.1p1 and it was essentially the
>> same. Since I need it working and have limited time, I'll probably do
>> some more or less ugly "local hack" (excluding privsep if that's "too
>> hard") for now. At least you didn't say "it can't possibly be done".:-)
>
>It's certainly possible for the privsep=no case, whether or not it's
>possible for privsep=yes will depend on when PAM performs the switch.
>(If it's just in the authentication or account stacks then privsep will
>probably be workable, otherwise it's probably not possible. Certainly
>not without a significant amount of work.)
It happens in authentication, in pam_[sm_]authenticate() - later seems
pretty weird to me. Incidentally, the "standard" FreeBSD pam_radius
module has functionality like this - see the description of
template_user in http://www.daemon-systems.org/man/pam_radius.8.html
(though I'm actually doing this on Linux, with a (by now) non-"standard"
module).
>I'm not convinced it's a good idea in general, though, since it means
>bypassing at least some of sshd's account validity checks.
My thinking is that those checks should be done *after* the PAM
authentication (and retrieval of the username from PAM), not before. Or
at least that failing the validity checks pre-PAM-authentication should
not be fatal (provided the checks succeed post-authentication). Or at
least that this should be allowed under the control of a config option.
>> Yes, they seem to work the same in 4.1p1 - both "try" PAM, but
>> (intentionally) replace the password to make sure it fails.:-)
>
>Yeah, this is one of the problems with PAM: it assumes that the
>application will play absolutely no part in the authentication process
>other than passing messages for it.
Well, maybe the problem is that sshd insists on playing that part with
PAM authentication too.:-) I'm no great fan of PAM, but I'm sure the
sshd validity checks could be implemented (ssh-specifically if so
desired) within PAM. But I can see that you would get a lot of boring
questions if things like AllowUsers just stopped working when you used
PAM (unless the corresponding config was also in PAM).
>There's no way to tell PAM "do whatever you would normally do for a
>failed login since I'm going to deny it anyway", so in order to prevent
>leaking information (ie fast deny for a good password, slow deny for a
>wrong one) sshd has to do nasty hacks such as deliberately trashing the
>password response.
Hm, PAM shouldn't decide to delay a rejection on its own I think, but
I'm sure that given the lack of a PAM "standard" some implementations
do. In my particular case, I'm testing against a FreeRadius
implementation that delays access-reject but not access-accept (some
sort of DOS prevention according to the docs) - not much PAM can do
about that...
But obviously this isn't really possible to handle with only post-
authentication validity checks - sshd simply won't know if it should
reject the user until after authentication. So it probably should
require turning on a config option, leaving the admin to deal with the
consequences (or avoid them by making sure that no succesful PAM auth
will be subsequently rejected by sshd).
--Per Hedeland
per@hedeland.org
- Previous message: Martin Paul: "Re: Password Guessing"
- In reply to: Darren Tucker: "Re: PAM changing user name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
