Re: "Best practices" or "Best implementations"?
From: Christoph Weizen (cwei_at_gmx.net)
Date: 04/30/05
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: "Best practices" or "Best implementations"?"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: "Best practices" or "Best implementations"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 16:21:57 +0200
Richard E. Silverman wrote:
>>>>>>"CW" == Christoph Weizen <cwei@gmx.net> writes:
>
> CW> Hi list, I wonder how to implement OpenSSH the smart way. We have
> CW> ~70 hosts (AIX 5.2/5.3), several with HACMP using r-tools and
> CW> Kerberos.
>
> OpenSSH works smoothly with Kerberos for both server and user
> authentication. With ticket forwarding, you can then use ksu for
> automatic, logged access to other accounts.
This sounds good. I'll have to go deeper into Kerberos.
> CW> Well, all have its pros and cons. I read SSH from O'Reilly - I
> CW> don't think I have technical problems, but more organisational
> CW> problems.
>
> We just finished the 2nd edition of the snail book, and it contains a
> substantial section on Kerberos & PKI with SSH (which I wrote).
So, the 2nd edition is now pre-ordered. ;)
Nevertheless I still wonder how other people implemented OpenSSH in a
big server environment (server farm).
cheers,
Christoph
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: "Best practices" or "Best implementations"?"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: "Best practices" or "Best implementations"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|