Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?
From: Sooner Al [MVP] (SoonerAl_at_somewhere.net.invalid)
Date: 03/31/05
- Next message: Manish Mukherjee: "openssh port to VxWorks"
- Previous message: Simon Tatham: "Re: PuTTY/SSH-2.0-Sun_SSH_1.0.1/SSH-2 rekey bug"
- In reply to: David Magda: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:25:48 -0600
Here is an old thread that may be of interest concerning this issue...
-- Al Jarvi (MS-MVP Windows Networking) Please post *ALL* questions and replies to the news group for the mutual benefit of all of us... The MS-MVP Program - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights... "David Magda" <dmagda+trace050112@ee.ryerson.ca> wrote in message news:861x9x5e6h.fsf@number6.magda.ca... > "Sooner Al [MVP]" <SoonerAl@somewhere.net.invalid> writes: > >> Its encrypted at 128-bits so using a *strong password* should be >> sufficient. >> >> With that said...personally I run RD through a SSH tunnel and use a >> public/private key with a strong passphrase verus password >> authentication. > > Just because something has been sprinkled with '128-bit encryption > pixie dust' doesn't mean it's secure. Heck, WEP can use 104 bits and > do you think anyone trusts it? :) > > It all depends on your level of paranoia. > > -- > David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>, http://www.magda.ca/ > Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under > the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well > under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI
- Next message: Manish Mukherjee: "openssh port to VxWorks"
- Previous message: Simon Tatham: "Re: PuTTY/SSH-2.0-Sun_SSH_1.0.1/SSH-2 rekey bug"
- In reply to: David Magda: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
