Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?
From: David Magda (dmagda+trace050112_at_ee.ryerson.ca)
Date: 03/30/05
- Next message: Benjamin Rutt: "error in locking authority file (backgrounded ssh sessions)"
- Previous message: Holdo: "Re: Public Key authentication not responding to public key?"
- In reply to: Sooner Al [MVP]: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Next in thread: Sooner Al [MVP]: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Reply: Sooner Al [MVP]: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 30 Mar 2005 10:47:02 -0500
"Sooner Al [MVP]" <SoonerAl@somewhere.net.invalid> writes:
> Its encrypted at 128-bits so using a *strong password* should be
> sufficient.
>
> With that said...personally I run RD through a SSH tunnel and use a
> public/private key with a strong passphrase verus password
> authentication.
Just because something has been sprinkled with '128-bit encryption
pixie dust' doesn't mean it's secure. Heck, WEP can use 104 bits and
do you think anyone trusts it? :)
It all depends on your level of paranoia.
-- David Magda <dmagda at ee.ryerson.ca>, http://www.magda.ca/ Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. -- Niccolo Machiavelli, _The Prince_, Chapter VI
- Next message: Benjamin Rutt: "error in locking authority file (backgrounded ssh sessions)"
- Previous message: Holdo: "Re: Public Key authentication not responding to public key?"
- In reply to: Sooner Al [MVP]: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Next in thread: Sooner Al [MVP]: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Reply: Sooner Al [MVP]: "Re: How good is Windows RDP's encryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
