Re: SFTP versus FTP over SSH2
From: Will (DELETE_westes_at_earthbroadcast.com)
Date: 03/09/05
- Next message: Darren Tucker: "Re: SMTP over SSH Tunnel error using putty: Corrupted MAC on Input"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH newbie"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SFTP versus FTP over SSH2"
- Next in thread: Jacob Nevins: "Re: SFTP versus FTP over SSH2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:04:28 -0800
We were using SecureFX. Can you explain how it uses FTP over SSH2.
SecureFX specifies that connection option as an alternative to SFTP.
-- Will "Richard E. Silverman" <res@qoxp.net> wrote in message news:m2y8cyfibe.fsf@darwin.oankali.net... > >>>>> "Will" == Will <DELETE_westes@earthbroadcast.com> writes: > > Will> Can someone please explain what is the difference between SFTP > Will> and FTP over SSH2? Is SFTP less secure? > > Actually, you need to explain what you mean by "FTP over SSH2;" you did > not say what client you're using or how it's operating, and it is more > likely that SFTP is more secure. SFTP is a completely distinct > file-transfer protocol from FTP. It is specified by a draft of the SSH > working group and is designed to work over a secure full-duplex > connection, such as SSH. FTP, on the other hand, uses multiple TCP > connections in its operation and is not easily secured by SSH static port > forwarding. Unless you're using an SSH client with special FTP support > (such as Tectia, or SecureFX), it is likely that you were only protecting > the FTP command channel and not the data transfers.
- Next message: Darren Tucker: "Re: SMTP over SSH Tunnel error using putty: Corrupted MAC on Input"
- Previous message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH newbie"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SFTP versus FTP over SSH2"
- Next in thread: Jacob Nevins: "Re: SFTP versus FTP over SSH2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|