Re: Speed Difference SCP vs. RCP
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia (nkadel_at_comcast.net)
Date: 01/26/05
- Previous message: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- In reply to: Michael: "Re: Speed Difference SCP vs. RCP"
- Next in thread: David Magda: "Re: Speed Difference SCP vs. RCP"
- Reply: David Magda: "Re: Speed Difference SCP vs. RCP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:00:10 -0500
"Michael" <michaeln@twentyten.org> wrote in message
news:10vc57orujvae21@corp.supernews.com...
> "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:9cedncberMAckmvcRVn-jA@comcast.com...
>
> [snip]
>
>> Bad! Bad! No sys-admin biscuit!
>>
>> Don't use scp or rcp for backups, because they will duplicate the
>> contents
>> of symbolic links rather than the link itself. It only takes one symbolic
>> link back up to / to explode your backup system.
>
> Eh.... I just didn't fully explain what I was doing. The nightly backups
> are done using rsync. The backups of a quickly changing mail system
> (large
> mbox files that are constantly being appended to) are done using
> rdiff-backup. What I'm doing is somewhat inconsequential because the
> basic
> issue of SCP vs. RCP still exists either way.
OK, that makes sense. But the rsync can occur using *neither* ssh nor rsh,
simply using an rsync server on your backup system allowing write access, or
an rsync server on your system being backed up and allowing a pull
operation. Using the native rsync port and protocal, rather than tunneling
it over rsh or ssh, prevents all sorts of potential user login issues.
- Previous message: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- In reply to: Michael: "Re: Speed Difference SCP vs. RCP"
- Next in thread: David Magda: "Re: Speed Difference SCP vs. RCP"
- Reply: David Magda: "Re: Speed Difference SCP vs. RCP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|