rsa v. dsa authentication
From: Chuck (skilover_nospam_at_softhome.net)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- Previous message: Sachin: "SecureFTP through firewall fails"
- Next in thread: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- Reply: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:40:59 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Is there any significant advantage of using one over the other? I
thought I read somewhere that RSA is more secure, but one of my
sysadmins read that DSA is.
- --
To reply by email remove "_nospam"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB953rzIf+rZpn0oQRAoheAJ9T8rCl7Buic1/wYCZCc/int+yknACeLPHE
eKAQEhN9xqKalbhdffQIii4=
=+nNX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- Previous message: Sachin: "SecureFTP through firewall fails"
- Next in thread: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- Reply: Simon Tatham: "Re: rsa v. dsa authentication"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|