Re: How to prevent or quickly fix hosed ssh tunnels
From: all mail refused (elvis_at_notatla.org.uk)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Darren Tucker: "Re: What's the deal on the -X vs -Y thing?"
- Previous message: Darren Tucker: "Re: What's the deal on the -X vs -Y thing?"
- In reply to: Thursday: "Re: How to prevent or quickly fix hosed ssh tunnels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 26 Jan 2005 01:06:49 GMT
In article <LYxJd.21889$by5.20379@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>, Thursday wrote:
>Upon investigating further, it seems to be a problem with the remote
>server not terminating the old ssh tunnels.
>
>The remote server seems completely unaware that the old ssh tunnels must
>be killed/closed. The remote server continues have an ESTABLISHED state
>Is there a better way to fix this than simply having a remote .bashrc
>script that kills the old ssh tunnels upon login initiated by the new
>tunnel?
Do you have TCPKeepAlive (default for some systmes) and/or
ClientAliveInterval set ? I think these are meant to help with your situation.
See also (wrapped URL):
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=m2sm4s7ic1.
fsf%40darwin.oankali.net
-- Elvis Notargiacomo master AT barefaced DOT cheek http://www.notatla.org.uk/goen/ 7.031: OnACPower returned value( 0x1 ) which is Equal To 0x1
- Next message: Darren Tucker: "Re: What's the deal on the -X vs -Y thing?"
- Previous message: Darren Tucker: "Re: What's the deal on the -X vs -Y thing?"
- In reply to: Thursday: "Re: How to prevent or quickly fix hosed ssh tunnels"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]