Re: 'password-less' logins on solaris 2.5.1 boxen - subtle troubles.
From: Richard E. Silverman (res_at_qoxp.net)
Date: 01/15/05
- Next message: Nick: "Remote command over a tunnel problems"
- Previous message: Terry Richards: "Re: running x applications"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: 'password-less' logins on solaris 2.5.1 boxen - subtle troubles."
- Next in thread: joeblow: "Re: 'password-less' logins on solaris 2.5.1 boxen - subtle troubles."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 14 Jan 2005 23:31:45 -0500
>>>>> "BU" == Bill Unruh <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> writes:
BU> NONONONONO. You do NOT want to send them your private key as well,
BU> UNLESS you have control of that machine and really want the root
BU> on that machine to be able to read the private key and thus be
BU> able to read everything.
Actually, having a user's private key would not enable an observer to read
SSH-encrypted data -- both it and the hostkey are used for authentication
only.
-- Richard Silverman res@qoxp.net
- Next message: Nick: "Remote command over a tunnel problems"
- Previous message: Terry Richards: "Re: running x applications"
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: 'password-less' logins on solaris 2.5.1 boxen - subtle troubles."
- Next in thread: joeblow: "Re: 'password-less' logins on solaris 2.5.1 boxen - subtle troubles."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|