tunnel smb: server load?
From: Claus Atzenbeck (claus.atzenbeck_at_freenet.de)
Date: 11/25/04
- Next message: Chris Nystrom: "SSH pipe probelm"
- Previous message: Hans: "PermitRootLogin without-password and UsePAM yes doesn't work"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: tunnel smb: server load?"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: tunnel smb: server load?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:44:35 +0100
Hi,
sometimes I tunnel smb from the server to my machine. For this, I use
ssh -l claus -L 139:some.destination.server.com:139
on my client machine.
Everything works fine, however, somebody told me that transferring many or
large files through the Samba tunnel would cause heavy CPU load (compared
to a direct connection to the Samba server), because it needs to be
encrypted and decrypted.
To this, I have some questions:
(1) Where is the most CPU load when files are copied, at the server or
client side?
(2) Is the CPU load significantly higher?
Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
Claus
- Next message: Chris Nystrom: "SSH pipe probelm"
- Previous message: Hans: "PermitRootLogin without-password and UsePAM yes doesn't work"
- Next in thread: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: tunnel smb: server load?"
- Reply: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: tunnel smb: server load?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|