Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks
From: Neil W Rickert (rickert+nn_at_cs.niu.edu)
Date: 10/14/04
- Previous message: John: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- In reply to: John: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Reply: Bill Unruh: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Reply: John: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:44:21 +0000 (UTC)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
h1d3m3@yahoo.com (John) writes:
>> Why? again so what if they try passwords? And then you will suddenly
>> discover yourself locked out because something happened to your
>> .authorized_keys file. Ie, is the cure worse than the disease?
>I guess I wasn't clear here.
>Right now, I can ssh to a machine and attempt to "brute force" my way
>into the system. All of the users on this system have
>~/.ssh/authorized_keys2 files (and those keys have passwords). The
>/etc/password file has their account, but the password is effectively
>untypeable (i.e. GECOS password field is *LK* or something like
>that....this means if telnet/ftp was turned on, they would never be
>able to use it).
I don't see how this changes anything.
I only use public key authentication. But there still are times
where I try to login before adding my key to ssh-agent, or make some
other dumb mistake, and am prompted for a passwd.
I normally abort that attempt, fix the problem, and then login with a
public key. If your policies were in effect I would find myself
locked out.
Maybe you have a super-human set of users who never make such dumb
mistakes.
I tend to look at it the other way -- if login is only possible with
public key authentication, then the brute force attacks are harmless
except for the cpu cycles they consume.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (SunOS)
iD8DBQFBbp7RvmGe70vHPUMRAogPAKCGat9Wkh8loGl8652DjxD7BRRE7QCfQkSA
i228dkrsfZ2O+g7TBeNdvD4=
=N7QN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- vote for regime change in Washington, Nov 02.
- Previous message: John: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- In reply to: John: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Reply: Bill Unruh: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Reply: John: "Re: Stopping Brute Force SSH Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|