Re: scp in unattended batch mode
From: LRW (deja_at_celticbear.com)
Date: 06/17/04
- Next message: Jack Moe: "Re: scp in unattended batch mode"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: OpenSSH with RSA auth on XP (Cygwin) Problem"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: scp in unattended batch mode"
- Next in thread: Jack Moe: "Re: scp in unattended batch mode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 17 Jun 2004 12:01:13 -0700
Richard E. Silverman <res@qoxp.net> wrote in message news:<m2wu269s8v.fsf@darwin.oankali.net>...
> >>>>> "LRW" == LRW <deja@celticbear.com> writes:
>
> LRW> I know it's not good security, but just to make sure I had it
> LRW> covered I chmod 777 recursively the entire user's directory on
>
> That would ensure that it *not* work -- ~, ~/.ssh/, and
> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys must normally be writable only by the owner or
> root.
Oh, good to know! Should 744 work, all else being equal?
- Next message: Jack Moe: "Re: scp in unattended batch mode"
- Previous message: Richard: "Re: OpenSSH with RSA auth on XP (Cygwin) Problem"
- In reply to: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: scp in unattended batch mode"
- Next in thread: Jack Moe: "Re: scp in unattended batch mode"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|