Re: Proposed enhancement to scp
From: Darren Tucker (dtucker_at_dodgy.net.au)
Date: 02/27/04
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH tunneling/port forwarding and stateful packet inspection"
- Previous message: Dimitri Maziuk: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- In reply to: Dimitri Maziuk: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:20:00 +0000 (UTC)
In article <slrnc3t5sh.mcd.dima@odyssey.bmrb.wisc.edu>,
Dimitri Maziuk <abuse@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>"Improvements over rcp"? OpenSSH website says right on the front
>page: "... scp which replaces rcp ..." Which makes the argument
>"scp won't do it if rcp does not" perfectly valid.
This has just been added, which will hopefully clear things up :-)
http://www.openssh.com/faq.html#2.10
--
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.
- Next message: Richard E. Silverman: "Re: SSH tunneling/port forwarding and stateful packet inspection"
- Previous message: Dimitri Maziuk: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- In reply to: Dimitri Maziuk: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Next in thread: Bill Unruh: "Re: Proposed enhancement to scp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|